Influence of Dietary Manipulation on DM, N, and P Excretion of Pigs during an Entire Finishing Period.
M.B.
Story in Brief
The size of swine operations has grown dramatically and, with
it, the volume of manure produced in specific geographic areas. The fate of
manure is land application. Nutrients applied in excess of crop requirements
can be associated with environmental pollution. Excess of nutrients, such as
nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), can leach or runoff into water bodies.
Therefore, in order to reduce N and P excretion in swine manure, an experiment
was conducted to determine the effect of reducing dietary levels of protein
(CP) and P on dry matter (DM), N, and P excretion during an entire finishing
period. A total of 48
Key Words: Nutrient Excretion, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Pigs.
Introduction
It is well known that nutrients applied to the land in excess of crop requirements can result in environmental pollution. Application of excessive N and P can cause these nutrients to runoff into surface water or leach into ground water. If N and P concentration in water increases, it can induce algae growth and, with it, the reduction of oxygen needed to preserve aquatic life. In order to decrease N and P excretion in swine manure, some dietary manipulations have been proposed, including a reduction in the dietary level of CP with the addition of crystalline amino acids (Kerr et al., 2003a, Kerr et al., 2003b, Otto et al., 2003) and reduction of P level in the diet (Cromwell et al., 1995). However, most experiments have been performed using individually-fed animals, and very little data is available for N and P excretion under commercial conditions. Therefore, the overall objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of reducing dietary levels of CP and P on DM, N and P excretion during the finishing period.
Materials and Methods
A total of 48
|
Table 1. Composition of diets |
||||||
|
Phase |
1 (66 - 112 lb) |
2 (112 - 187 lb) |
3 (187 - 240 lb) |
|||
|
Diet |
Control |
LED |
Control |
LED |
Control |
LED |
|
Ingredients, % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corn |
68.98 |
80.11 |
74.44 |
85.39 |
79.73 |
90.68 |
|
Soybean meal |
25.84 |
14.51 |
20.68 |
9.33 |
15.54 |
4.19 |
|
L-lysine |
- |
.35 |
- |
.36 |
- |
.36 |
|
DL-methionine |
- |
.01 |
- |
.01 |
- |
- |
|
L-threonine |
- |
.10 |
- |
.11 |
- |
.10 |
|
L-tryptophan |
- |
.03 |
- |
.03 |
- |
.04 |
|
Soybean oil |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.10 |
3.00 |
3.10 |
|
Dicalcium phosphate |
.68 |
.39 |
.52 |
.24 |
.36 |
.08 |
|
Limestone |
.96 |
.95 |
.82 |
.78 |
.82 |
.81 |
|
Salt |
.25 |
.25 |
.25 |
.25 |
.25 |
.25 |
|
Vitamin Mix |
.15 |
.15 |
.15 |
.15 |
.15 |
.15 |
|
Trace Mineral Mix |
.10 |
.10 |
.10 |
.10 |
.10 |
.10 |
|
Calculated composition, % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP |
18.00 |
14.00 |
16.00 |
12.00 |
14.00 |
10.00 |
|
True digestible lysine |
.83 |
.83 |
.71 |
.71 |
.58 |
.58 |
|
P |
.50 |
.40 |
.45 |
.35 |
.40 |
.30 |
Pigs were weighed, feed intake was measured, and slurry samples were taken each week during the entire finishing period (112 d). The finishing period ended when pigs reached a target weight of 240 lb. Feed and slurry samples were analyzed for DM, N, and P. The data were analyzed using a randomized complete block design including the effects of treatment, block and the interaction.
Results and Discussion
All pigs were fed to a target weight of 240 lb. The finishing period for pigs fed the LED was 7 d longer (P<.05) as compared with pigs fed the control diet. This reduction in growth rate was not observed by other researchers working with similar reductions in dietary CP level (Kerr et al., 2003a, Kerr et al., 2003b). However, in this experiment P was also reduced, which may be associated with the decrease in growth rate.
DM intake and daily excretion were similar for both treatments. Also, when DM excretion was analyzed as percentage of intake, it was similar between diets, mainly due to similar feed intake and DM content of the diets. The data is presented in Table 2.
|
Table 2. Excretion data for DM, N and P. |
|||
|
Diet |
Control |
LED |
P value |
|
Pig's final Wt, lb |
239.8 |
237.6 |
>.1 |
|
Duration of finishing period, d |
105 |
112 |
<.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM intake, kg/pig/d |
1.89 |
1.83 |
>.1 |
|
DM excretion, g/pig/d |
274 |
269 |
>.1 |
|
DM excretion, as % of intake |
14.5 |
14.5 |
>.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N intake, g/pig/d |
53 |
38 |
<.01 |
|
N excretion, g/pig/d |
34.7 |
20.6 |
<.02 |
|
N excretion, as % of intake |
65 |
53 |
<.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P intake, g/pig/d |
9.3 |
7.1 |
<.01 |
|
P excretion, g/pig/d |
6.8 |
5.1 |
<.02 |
|
P excretion, as % of intake |
72 |
72 |
>.1 |
N intake was reduced by 28% (P<.01) and daily N excretion by 40% (P<.02) with the LED (Table 2). This reduction in N excretion is in agreement with previous reports where a 10% reduction in N excretion was observed for each percent unit reduction in dietary CP (Shriver et al., 2003). The N excretion value measured for the control diet (34.7 g/d of N) is in agreement with the value estimated by Carter et al. (2003) (39.9 g/d N) using their prediction model for standard production conditions. Also, when the performance values of the animals used in this experiment and diet characteristics were used with their prediction model, the N excretion values predicted with the model for the control and LED were very close to the values measured in this experiment. When N excretion was analyzed as percentage of intake it decreased by 18% with the LED (P<.01). This decrease in N excretion is consistent with previous reports (Kerr and Easter, 1995, Shriver et al., 2003) and may be due to an increase in essential amino acid digestibility (Otto et al., 2003).
P intake was reduced by 24% (P<.01) with the LED. Daily P excretion was reduced by 25% (P<.02) (Table 2). The value measured for P excretion with the control diet (6.8 g/d of P) is similar to the value estimated by Carter et al. (2003) (6.7 g/d of P) using their prediction model for standard production conditions. When the performance values of the experimental pigs and diet characteristics were used with their prediction model, the daily P excretion predicted for the control and the LED were similar to the values measured in this experiment. When P excretion was analyzed as percentage of intake, it was not affected by dietary treatment. The P excretion values as percentage of intake obtained in this experiment were consistent with previous reports using individually-fed animals (Kornegay and Harper, 1997).
When cumulative excretion was analyzed, N and P excretion for
the entire finishing period tended to decrease by 38 and 20%, respectively, as
presented in Figure 1. The use of the LED resulted in a reduction of 1.36 kg of
N and 0.14 kg of P per finisher pig. These reductions in N and P excretion
represent a possibility to reduce the total amount of N and P excreted in swine
manure in US commercial operations per year. If the total number of head
slaughtered in 2005 (103.4 million) is used to estimate the possible reduction
in nutrients excreted per year, N and P excreted could be reduced by 140,624
and 14,476 metric tons, respectively. 
In summary, a reduction of 4% unit of CP and 0.1% unit of P in grower-finisher diets decreased daily N and P excretion by 40 and 25%, respectively. It also tended to decrease cumulative N and P excreted by 38% and 20%, respectively, during a 112-day finishing period.
Literature Cited
Carter et al. 2003. Animal Agricultural and Food Processing Waste IX. 285-295.
Cromwell et al. 1995. J. Anim. Sci. 73:449-456.
Kerr and Easter. 1995. J. Anim. Sci. 73:3000-3008.
Kerr et al. 2003a. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1998-2007.
Kerr et al. 2003b. J. Anim. Sci. 81:3075-3087.
Kornegay and Harper. 1997. The Professional Animal Scientist. 13:99-111.
Otto et al., 2003. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1743-1753.
Shriver et al. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. 81:492-502.
Acknowledgements
The authors express special thanks to USDA-CSREES and the Oklahoma Pork Council for their support of this experiment.
Copyright 2006 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.
Authors
M.B. Lachmann. - Graduate Research Assistant.
S.D. Carter. - Associate Professor
T.A. Buhay. - Graduate Research Assistant
R.P. Cueno. - Graduate Research Assistnat
S.K. Jenkins. - Graduate Research Assistant.
Z. Marable. - Undergraduate Research Assistant