Growth and Carcass Characteristics of Rambouillet, Dorset x Rambouillet and Romanov x Dorset-Rambouillet Ewes from Fall Lambing
S.Erat, D.S. Buchanan, G.Q. Fitch and W.A. Philips
Story in Brief
Rambuillet, Dorset x Rambouillet and Romanov x Dorset-Rambouillet
ewes were evaluated for growth and carcass performance. Ewes were mated to Hampshire and
Key Words: Sheep, Crossbred Ewes, Growth, Carcass
Introduction
Growth and carcass traits are economically important to sheep producers. Producers want lambs to reach market weight as early as possible to save on feed costs. The purpose of a selection program for improved carcass merit is to produce more valuable carcass. Heritability for growth trait is considered moderate. This means any selection program that focuses on growth rate usually results in rapid genetic gain. However, many non-genetic factors (sex of lamb, year, age of dam, season, type of birth) can also affect growth traits in sheep production. Carcass traits have moderate to high heritabilities, suggesting that a selection program that emphasizes carcass traits can result in significant genetic improvement. The purpose of this paper is to report the growth and carcass characteristics of Rambouillet, Dorset x Rambouillet, and Romanov cross ewes as dams of crossbred fall born lambs.
Materials and Methods
The data used in this study were obtained from the USDA-ARS
Grazinglands Research Laboratory near
Ewes were mated to rams for 45 d beginning on May 1 of each
year. Hampshire and
Lambs within a lambing group were weaned on the same day
regardless of age. Lambs were
separated from their dams, vaccinated for overeating disease and returned to
the wheat pasture and creep feeder.
Using the weaning data, lambs were blocked by sex and ewe breed and
ranked by weaning weight within block.
Within each block, lambs were randomly assigned to be finished in the
feedlot or on wheat pasture with ad libitum access to the same diet in the
feedlot. In the feedlot, lambs
within each block were fed in separate pens to determine feed intake. Lambs were fasted for 16 h before the
initial and feedlot weights were taken.
When 80% of lambs had reached a weight of 100 lbs the feedlot portion
was terminated. Lambs weighing 100
lbs were transported to
Data for each lambing record included dam id, lamb id, ewe breed, age of dam, lambing date, sex of offspring, type of birth (born as single and born as multiple), birth weight, weaning weight, final weight, weaning date, year of birth/lambing, hot carcass weight, ribeye area, fat thickness, dressing percentage, leg conformation, flank fat streakings, and conformation.
Traits subjected to statistical analysis were: birth weight (BWT)- weight of individual lamb taken within 24 hr of birth, adjusted weaning weight (ADJWW) - weight of individual lamb at weaning adjusted to a common age of 90-d, hot carcass weight (HCW), ribeye area (REA) - average area of the right and left ribeye or longissimus muscle as square inches, adjusted fat thickness (ADJFAT) - measured as inches at the 12th rib, dressing percentage (DP), leg conformation (LEG) - the degree of muscling in the leg expressed in terms of one-third of a conformation grade ; measured as Prime+ = 15, Average Prime = 14, Prime- = 13, Choice+ = 12, Average Choice = 11, Choice- = 10, flank fat streakings (FFS) - fat deposits visible on the inside surfaces of primary and secondary flank muscles ; measured as Prime+ = 15, Average Prime = 14, Prime- = 13, Choice+ = 12, Average Choice = 11, Choice- = 10 and conformation (CONF) - a subjective evaluation of relative distribution of muscling, especially in the leg, loin, rack, and shoulder regions ; measured as Prime+ = 15, Average Prime = 14, Prime- = 13, Choice+ = 12, Average Choice = 11, Choice- = 10.
All traits were analyzed by least squares analysis of variance. Terms included in the statistical models were the main effects of breed group of dam, year of birth, age of dam, type of birth, sex of lamb as well as appropriate two-way interactions.
Results and Discussion
Least squares means for BWT and ADJWW are presented in Table 1. DR ewes had the heaviest lambs at birth and weaning compared to other two breeds. DR and RAMB lambs were heavier at birth and weaning than ROM lambs (P<.05). However, there was no significant difference between DR and RAMB lambs at birth and weaning. Sex of lamb influenced (P<.01) BWT, but not ADJWW. Male lambs were heavier than female lambs at birth. Weights of the male and female lambs were similar at weaning. Type of birth also had an effect (P<.001) on growth weight. Lambs born as multiples were lighter than lambs born as singles at both birth and weaning.
|
Table 1. Least squares means and standard errors for lamb birth weight (BWT) and adjusted weaning weight (ADJWW) |
||||||
|
|
BWT (lb) |
ADJWW (lb) |
||||
|
Source of variationa |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
|
Ewe breeds |
* |
* |
||||
|
DR |
306 |
9.96b |
.39 |
284 |
63.25b |
1.66 |
|
RAMB |
251 |
9.85b |
.43 |
216 |
62.32b |
1.90 |
|
ROM |
313 |
9.24c |
.41 |
287 |
59.09c |
1.98 |
|
Sex of lamb |
** |
|
||||
|
female |
457 |
8.80b |
.50 |
410 |
60.58 |
1.68 |
|
male |
413 |
10.56c |
.54 |
377 |
62.51 |
1.71 |
|
Type of birth |
*** |
*** |
||||
|
single |
404 |
10.57b |
.41 |
368 |
67.14b |
1.76 |
|
multiple |
466 |
8.79c |
.37 |
419 |
55.96c |
1.71 |
|
aDR = b,cMeans within a column in a subgroup with different superscripts differ (P<.05). *P<.05, **P<.01, ***P<.001. |
||||||
Least squares means for carcass traits are presented in Table 2 and 3. Ewe breed differences were observed only in HCW and REA. DR crossbred lambs produced the heaviest (P<.05) HCW and the largest REA (P<.01) than RAMB and ROM lambs. No significant differences were observed between RAMB and ROM lambs for both HCW and REA. Type of birth did not have effect on HCW and REA while sex of lamb had only effect on REA where male lambs had larger longissimus muscle than female lambs (P<.001). ADJFAT, DP, LEG, FFS, and CONF were not different for ewe breed group, type of birth and sex of lamb except that single born lambs had higher fat thickness than multiple born lambs (P<.001). Overall The Dorset cross ewes were superior in birth weight and weaning weight, as well as having better carcass composition that make them attractive for Oklahoma sheep producers.
|
Table 2. Least
squares means and standard errors for hot carcass weight (HCW)b,
ribeye area (REA)c
and adjusted fat
thickness(ADJFAT)d |
|||||||||
|
|
HCW |
REA |
ADJFAT |
||||||
|
Source of variationa |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
|
Ewe breeds |
* |
*** |
|
||||||
|
DR |
222 |
63.27e |
4.94 |
223 |
2.64e |
.06 |
223 |
.29 |
.01 |
|
RAMB |
176 |
57.71f |
5.28 |
177 |
2.54f |
.07 |
177 |
.27 |
.01 |
|
ROM |
205 |
57.62f |
5.20 |
205 |
2.47f |
.07 |
205 |
.27 |
.01 |
|
Sex of lamb |
|
** |
|
||||||
|
female |
315 |
54.42 |
5.13 |
315 |
2.50e |
.06 |
315 |
.28 |
.01 |
|
male |
288 |
64.65 |
6.32 |
290 |
2.60f |
.06 |
290 |
.28 |
.01 |
|
Type of birth |
|
|
*** |
||||||
|
single |
298 |
63.37 |
3.23 |
298 |
2.62 |
.04 |
298 |
.29e |
.01 |
|
multiple |
305 |
55.70 |
9.34 |
307 |
2.48 |
.12 |
307 |
.27f |
.01 |
|
aDR = bHCW =Weight (lbs) of lamb carcass; cREA = Average area (in square inches) of the right and left ribeye (longissimus) muscle ; dADJFAT =Fat thickness (inches) at the 12th rib. e,fMeans within a column in a subgroup with different superscripts differ (P<.05). *P<.05, **P<.01, ***P<.001. |
|||||||||
|
Table 3. Least squares means and standard errors for dressing percentage (DP)b, leg conformation (LEG)c , flank fat streakings (FFS)d and conformation (CONF)e |
||||||||||||
|
|
DP |
LEG |
FFS |
CONF |
||||||||
|
Source of variationa |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
n |
LSMeans |
SE |
|
Ewe breeds |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
DR |
216 |
53.29 |
4.35 |
223 |
13.05 |
.53 |
222 |
11.96 |
.18 |
223 |
11.93 |
.14 |
|
RAMB |
171 |
49.38 |
4.66 |
177 |
12.82 |
.63 |
177 |
11.91 |
.20 |
177 |
11.95 |
.15 |
|
ROM |
203 |
49.90 |
4.58 |
205 |
13.03 |
.60 |
204 |
11.80 |
.19 |
205 |
11.81 |
.15 |
|
Sex of lamb |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
female |
307 |
50.02 |
4.50 |
315 |
12.77 |
.55 |
315 |
11.91 |
.18 |
315 |
11.89 |
.14 |
|
male |
283 |
51.70 |
5.54 |
290 |
13.17 |
.55 |
288 |
11.87 |
.19 |
290 |
11.90 |
.14 |
|
Type of birth |
|
|
|
|
||||||||