2000 Animal Science Research Report
Pages 98-103
Effects of Feeding Vitamin D on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits, and Meat Tenderness of Finishing Steers
B.A. Berry, D.R. Gill and R. Ball

Story in Brief

Feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and meat tenderness of steers fed supplemental vitamin D for 5 d followed by 2 d increased calcium supplementation during the 7 d prior to harvest were characterized.  Steers were fed either 0 or 6,000,000 IU of vitamin D from d 133 to d 137 of a finishing trial.  Vitamin D-fed cattle subsequently received increased levels of calcium until harvest 2 d later.  Vitamin D had no effect on tenderness in this trial, however skeletal maturities were less advanced.  Feedlot performance was greatly altered for cattle supplemented with vitamin D due to decreased feed consumption.  It is possible that muscle calcium pools were deleted due to decreased intake leading to a masking of vitamin D effects on tenderness.  These results do not suggest that feeding Vitamin D should be recommended as a tool to improve tenderness.

Key Words: Vitamin D3, Beef Cattle, Tenderness

Introduction

Smith et al. (1995) estimated that lack of tenderness in beef cuts costs the beef industry $250 million annually.  Although methods to improve tenderness could prove somewhat costly, beef producers would certainly benefit from these methods.   Steak tenderness was also ranked as the second most important factor in the 1995 National Beef Quality Audit.  Given the importance of improving tenderness in beef cattle, research in this area can benefit the industry greatly.  Vitamin D3 supplementation has been shown to increase tenderness (Swanek et al., 1997; Karges et al., 1999).  Although the mechanism by which Vitamin D3 increases tenderness has not been demonstrated, Swanek et al. (1999) hypothesized that increased Vitamin D may increase tenderization via increased calcium levels in muscle tissue at harvest.  This increased muscle pool then activates proteolytic enzymes that degrade certain muscle proteins.  The objective of this study was to test the efficacy, as well as effects on performance and carcass traits, of feeding elevated levels of Vitamin D to cattle prior to harvest in order to increase tenderness.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Diets.  Crossbred Angus x Senepol steers (n = 124, BW = 1265 ± 113 lb), stratified into five weight blocks for an implant experiment (Berry, 2000), were used to investigate the efficacy of feeding supplemental vitamin D3 for 5 d pre-harvest followed by increased supplemental calcium.  Two blocks, containing each implant treatment within the block, were randomly assigned to receive a diet formulated to contain 6,000,000 IU vitamin D/hd/d and twice the amount of calcium of the control diet.  The remaining three blocks continued to receive the control diet.  Although cattle in different blocks had different initial weights, blocks were assumed to have linear growth.  Vitamin D was removed from the diet 2 d prior to harvest and the calcium level remained elevated.  Diets are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

Steers were housed (5 steers/pen) in 25 partially covered pens (5 pens/block ) with the majority of the pen being uncovered and the cement pads and bunks being covered.  All steers received the control ration for the 132 d prior to the experiment.  Feed was delivered daily at approximately 7:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.  All animals were weighed on d 133 prior to the diet change. These weights received a 4% pencil-shrink and were used in calculating daily gains and feed conversions.  Final weights were calculated by dividing hot carcass weights by the mean dressing percentage from both treatments.

After 140 d on feed, steers were harvested at Excel Corporation in Dodge City, KS.  Following a 0°C, approximately 36-h chill period, Oklahoma State University personnel collected USDA quality and yield grade (USDA, 1997) carcass measurements.  Loin strips were removed from the right side of the carcass by plant personnel for Warner-Bratzler shear force evaluation and transported to Oklahoma State University where they were subsequently cut into three 1-in steaks.  One steak from each strip was aged at 0°C for 7 d prior to being placed in a -80°C freezer and two steaks were aged at 0°C for 14 d prior to placement in a -80°C freezer.  Steaks were tempered overnight at 0°C, cooked in an impingement oven to a 70°C core temperature and allowed to cool to room temperature prior to shear force evaluation.  Six, 1.25 cm core samples were removed from each steak and shear force pressure was evaluated using a Series IX Automated Materials Testing System 3.0.

Statistical Analysis.  Data were analyzed ordinary least squares (SAS, 1996) as a completely randomized design.  Pen served as the experimental unit for gain, dry matter intake, and efficiency data with steer being used for carcass traits.    Interactions between implant treatment and vitamin D were tested and removed from the model due to insignificance.  All feedlot performance models were evaluated using pen as the error term.

Results and Discussion

Feedlot performance data are presented in Table 3.  Dry matter intake declined (P<.002) as steers were fed supplemental vitamin D.  This depression led to decreased (P<.003) daily gain and lower (P<.02) gain:feed.  Steers receiving vitamin D had less advanced (P<.02) skeletal maturities with all other carcass traits being similar between treatment groups.  Carcass trait data are presented in Table 4.  Cattle that were fed vitamin D prior to harvest tended to have less (P<.16) tender steaks.  These results are in contrast with research by Swanek (1999), who found that supplemental vitamin D increased tenderness.  However, it is possible that the severe intake depression during the 7 d prior to harvest depleted muscle calcium stores.  It is also important to note that due to reduced intake, steers fed vitamin D consumed approximately 4,800,000 IU/hd/d of vitamin D rather than the formulated 6,000,000 IU/hd/d.

Literature Cited

Berry, B.A. et al.  2000.  Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. P-980:91.

Karges, K. et al.  1999.  Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. P-973:126.

SAS.  1996.  The SAS System for Windows (Release 6.12).  SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.

Shackelford, S.D. et al.  1991.  J. Musc. Foods. 2:289.

Smith, G.C. et al.  1995.  The final report of the National Beef Quality Audit.  National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, Englewood, CO.

Swanek, S.S. et al.  1999.  Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. P-973:55.

Swanek, S.S. et al.  1997.  Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. P-958:79.

USDA.  1997.  Agric. Mktg. Serv., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their extreme gratitude to the Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture for supplying livestock used in this study.  Also, special thanks to Turk Stovall and Jared Shriver for their contributions to this project.

 

Table 1.  Feedstuff and energy content of diets fed during 140-d
feeding period.

 

% Diet DM

Diet

Controla

Vitamin Db

Calciumc

Corn, whole-shelled

86.50
85.41
86.73

Cottonseed hulls

5.09
5.08
4.98

Supplement

8.39
9.5
8.30

 

 
 
 

NEm, Mcal/cwt

96.98
 
 

NEg, Mcal/cwt

62.15
 
 

Crude protein, %

12.49
 
 

aDiet fed to all steers d 0 to 132 and control steers d 133 to 140.

bDiet fed to vitamin D treatment steers d 133 to 137.

cDiet fed to vitamin D treatment steers d 138 to 139.

 

 

Table 2.  Supplements fed to steers during 140-d finishing period.

 

% Supplement DM

Diet

Controla

Vitamin Db

Calciumc

Cottonseed meal

40.99
35.80
36.15

Soymeal 47.7

30.26
26.43
26.75

Limestone 38%

13.46
23.38
23.62

Urea

6.67
5.79
5.91

Potassium chloride

4.05
3.48
3.50

Salt

3.93
3.37
3.50

Vitamin D

--
1.19
--

Rumensin 80

.18
.16
.16

Tylan 40

.13
.12
.12

Vitamin A –30,000

.13
.12
.12

Selenium 600

.07
.06
.06

Manganous oxide

.05
.04
.05

Zinc sulfate

.04
.03
.04

Vitamin E – 50%

.02
.02
.02

Copper sulfate

.01
.01
.01

aSupplement fed to all steers d 0 to 132 and control steers d 133 to 140.

bSupplement fed to vitamin D treatment steers d 133 to 137.

cSupplement fed to vitamin D treatment steers d 138 to 139.

 

 

 

Table 3.  Least squares means for feedlot performance during vitamin D supplementation at 6,000,000 IU/d.

 

Treatment

 

Item

Control

Vitamin D

SEMa

Prob > F

Steers

74
50
--
--

Pens, n

15
10
--
--

Weight, lb

Initial

1250
1286
10.75
.0618

Finalb

1301
1289
7.69
.3146

Daily gain, lb/d

7.30c
.55d
.81
.0030

Intake, lb DM/d

22.4c
17.9d
.48
.0019

Gain:feed

.33c
.02d
.05
.0105

aStandard error of the least-squares means.

bFinal weight = HCW/DP of all cattle.

c,dMeans in same row with different superscript differ significantly (P<.05).

 


 

Table 4.  Least squares means of carcass traits for cattle fed vitamin D prior to harvest

 

Treatmenta

 

 

Item

Control

Vitamin D

SEMb

Prob > F

HCW, lb

802
795
4.74
.3170

Dress, %

61.5
61.8
.52
.6855

Fat thickness, in

.36
.40
.12
.8029

Adj fat thck, in

.60
.57
.10
.8378

KPHF, %

3.1
3.3
.04
.0623

Ribeye area, in2

12.3
12.5
.17
.4317

Yield grade

3.6
3.5
.10
.2070

Lean maturityc

A38
A44
5.40
.3716

Skeletal maturityb

A49 g
A38 h
2.14
.0198

Marbling scored

Sm31
Sm24
8.49
.5696

Quality Grade

Choicee, %

74.3
72.6
1.2
--

Select, %

25
27.4
1.7
--

Standard, %

.7
0
0
--

Yield Grade

1, %

1.4
0
0
--

2, %

12.7
9.7
2.1
--

3, %

62.0
78.1
11.4
--

4, %

23.9
12.2
8.3
--

Shear force, lbF

Aged 7 d

8.9
9.6
.26
.1021

% toughf

23.9
39.0
10.7
--

Aged 14 d

8.7
9.3
.30
.1559

% toughf

15.5
39.0
16.6
--

aControl: steers fed control diet; Vitamin D: steers fed 6,000,000 IU/hd/d
Vit D.

bStandard error of the least-squares means.

cMaturity score: “A” between 9 and 30 mo of age.

dMarbling score: Sm = small00, the minimum required for USDA Choice.

eChoice = small00 to moderate99.

fDetermined by percent of cattle in treatment with shear values exceeding
10 lbF (Shackelford et al, 1991).

g,hMeans in same row with different superscripts differ (P < .05).

 

2000 Research Report - Table of Contents