1998 Animal Science Research Report
Boxed Beef Value and Percentage Yield of Steers in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout Program
Pages 21-27
Authors:

B.A. Gardner, S.L. Dolezal, H.G. Dolezal, and C.W. Shearhart

Story in Brief

The OSU Boxed Beef Calculator was used to generate closely trimmed boxed beef value (VALUE) and percentage yield (YIELD) on 2,208 steers fed in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout program from 1990 to 1997. Wholesale prices reflected a 2-yr average (1995 to 1996) for the 19 boxed beef items. Nonconforming carcasses (i.e., YG 4.0 or ) were priced separately. VALUE and YIELD were evaluated for differences due to season of birth and breed type. Data were analyzed using a model that included effects of year, season, year x season, sire type, and dam type. Year, season of production, and the year x season interaction were significant for VALUE and YIELD. Fall-born steers had higher VALUE than spring-born steers ($110.22 vs $109.10/cwt) for all years except 1995, despite a higher YIELD for spring-born steers. Seasonal differences may be attributed to the higher percentage of U.S. Choice carcasses from fall- vs spring-born steers (63.7 vs 55.2%, respectively). Categorization by sire breed type (Angus, ANG; other British, BRIT; Continental, CONT; Continental (milk), MCONT; Brahman Influence, BRAH) revealed that CONT and MCONT sired steers had a higher YIELD than ANG, BRIT, or BRAH. VALUE did not differ among ANG, CONT, or MCONT, but all had higher VALUE than BRIT and BRAH sired steers. Results indicate that season of birth and breed type affect boxed beef value and yield. Breed performance reflects trends in the OK Steer Feedout program and may not represent national breed differences.

(Key Words: Beef Cattle, Carcass, Value.)

Introduction

The beef industry is moving toward value-based marketing of live cattle. The change from traditional marketing methods of selling pounds of live animal create new targets for beef producers, not only in the finishing of cattle but throughout the production chain from cow-calf to end product. One challenge that must be met is to balance performance as well as the quality and quantity of red meat yield produced. Understanding breed strengths, biological cattle types, and management practices may help the beef industry to determine the best combination of performance and carcass characteristics in a value-based marketing system. Accordingly, the current study was conducted to evaluate sire breed type as well as season of production on profitability and boxed beef yield of steers fed in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout Program from 1990 to 1997.
 
 

Materials and Methods

Animals. Spring- and fall-born steer calves fed in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout from 1990 to 1997 (n = 2208) were used to determine closely trimmed (.25 in) boxed beef value and percentage of carcass weight that was boxed beef. Fall steers were born from late August to November and were placed on feed the following August. Spring calves were born from January to April and were placed on feed in early November. Prior to entering the feedlot, steers must have been weaned for a minimum of 3 wk, received proper vaccinations, and treated for horns, worms, grubs, and lice. Steers had free access to a high concentrate ration and were observed daily for health problems by feed yard personnel; those deemed "sick" were pulled and treated accordingly.

Steers were processed at a commercial meat packing facility when 60% of the calves were subjectively estimated to have a subcutaneous (external) fat thickness of 0.5 inch. Following a 40-h postmortem chill, data for yield and quality grade determinations (USDA, 1989) were collected by Oklahoma State Cooperative Extension Service personnel.

Value and Yield Determination. The OSU Boxed Beef Calculator (Gardner et al., 1996) was used to generate closely trimmed boxed beef value and percentage boxed beef yield on steers fed in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout program from 1990 to 1997. Wholesale prices reflected a 2-yr average (1995 to 1996) for the 19 boxed beef items. A base price was established for all conforming carcasses ($110.79/cwt); nonconforming carcasses were priced separately. YG 4 and greater, carcasses <550, and carcasses 999 received a $15/cwt discount from the base price, while carcasses 949 but <1000 were discounted $5/cwt from the base price.

Initial value of each feeder steer was calculated using entry feedlot weight and the average 10-yr price for various steer classes from 1986 to 1995: <500 lb = $96.53/cwt; 500 to 599 lb = $88.19/cwt; 600 to 699 lb = $82.42/cwt; 700 to 799 lb = $79.11/cwt; 800 lb = $75.27/cwt. A single feed efficiency was assumed for each pen of steers fed in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout and feed intake was calculated by multiplying weight gained in the feedlot by the pen feed efficiency. Feedlot costs included a ration cost of $160/ton on a dry matter basis and a daily yardage fee of $0.05/head. Net profit was calculated by subtracting gross feeder steer price, feed and medicine costs, yardage, and accrued interest from the gross finished steer value. Net profit accounted for both actual and opportunity costs using a 9% interest rate. Profit per day of age was determined by dividing net profit by steer age at the time of harvest. Profit per day on feed was calculated by dividing net profit by the days each steer was fed during the feedlot period.

Accumulated data were analyzed for differences between spring- vs fall-born steers and for differences in sire breed type. Differences in cow breed type were considered by the model, but results were not reported. Differences among sire breed type groups were partitioned using means separation procedures upon obtaining a significant F-test.

To determine sire breed difference, steers were grouped into one of five breed type classes. Sire breed types were: Angus (ANG) = Angus and Red Angus; British (BRIT) = Hereford (horned and polled) and Shorthorn; Continental (CONT) = Blonde d Aquitaine, Chianina, ChiAngus, Charolais, and Limousin; Milk Continental (MCONT) = Devon, Gelbvieh, Maine Anjou, Salers, Simmental, and Tarentaise; Brahman influenced (BRAH) = Brangus, Beefmaster, Charbray, Gelbray, Noble Line, Red Brangus, Santa Gertrudis, Senepol, and Simbrah.
 
 

Results and Discussion

Mean, minimum, and maximum values as well as standard deviations for live performance, carcass traits, and profitability characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Net profit ranged from a loss of -$360.54 to a gain of $284.35 per head. Carcass weight, marbling score, ribeye area, and fat thickness ranges indicate that non-conforming cattle exist in the Feedout mix, even though average performance may be acceptable. Net return of steers unacceptable in carcass weight (<550 or 950 lb), yield grade (4.0), or quality grade (U.S. Standard) averaged $108.63 less than their conforming counterparts (-$82.97 vs $25.66). Steer Feedout data prior to 1990 were summarized by Barnes et al. (1992).
 
 

Spring- vs Fall-born Steers. Year, season, and the year x season interaction were siginificant sources of variation (P<.05) for boxed beef value and yield. Table 2 presents mean live performance, carcass, and value characteristics for spring- and fall-born steers. Spring steers had lighter starting weight, final weight, and carcass weight, as well as a lower percentage of carcasses qualifying for the U.S. Choice quality grade. Although boxed beef percentage favored the spring-born group, fall-born calves had a $25 per head net profit advantage. Seasonal differences in profitability were attributed to quality grade differences between the two groups.
 
 

Steers Categorized by Sire Breed Type. Table 3 summarizes mean performance by sire breed type. Continental and Continental Milk sired steers had greater boxed beef yield percentage than other sire breed groups. Boxed beef value did not differ significantly among Angus type or Continental groups, but these three groups excelled in boxed beef value in comparison with British and Brahman influenced sire groups. Results indicate breed group differences in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout cattle mix, after accounting for dam breed type. However, interactions of sire and breed type were not accounted for due to partial confounding of these factors.
 
 

Implications

Boxed beef value and percentage yield from steers vary among sire breed types and season of production. Although sire breed type differences were evident in the Oklahoma Steer Feedout steer data, it is important to consider these results as a "snapshot" of performance in the beef production chain. Breed performance may not represent national differences. Also, inferences do not consider an integrated production system from cow-calf operation to end product.

Literature Cited

Barnes, K.C. et al. 1992. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. MP-136:205.

USDA. 1989. Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. AMS-USDA, Washington, DC.

Gardner, T.L. et al. 1996. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. P-951:31.
 
 
 

Table 1. Characteristics of all steers (n = 2208) fed in the OK Steer Feedout from 1990 to 1997.

Item

Mean

Minimum

Maximum

SD

In wt, lb

640

371

965

100.18

Sale wt, lba

1127

686

1579

124.45

Final age

430

330

719

37

Days fed 

165

132

188

12.84

ADG, lb

3.39

1.35

5.19

.54

Carcass wt, lb

716

439

1018

84.92

Dressing %

63.5

50.6

77.5

2.18

Fat thickness, in

.35

.05

1.00

.16

Ribeye area, in2

12.5

8.0

17.2

1.48

KPH fat, %

2.3

1.0

3.7

.51

Yield grade

2.5

.9

5.0

.65

Marbling scoreb

Sm09

Tr90

MAb10

65.93

Live $/cwt

70.13

55.20

91.66

4.55

Carcass $/cwt

109.90

95.48

140.33

6.65

Boxed beef, % cwt

69.33

62.49

82.03

2.34

Net profit, $/hd

21.52

-360.54

284.35

66.20

Profit/day of age

.049

-.85

.61

.15

Profit/day on feed

.132

-2.02

1.85

.40

a Sale weight = gross weight * .96.
b Marbling score: " MAb" = moderately abundant, the minimum required for U.S. average prime; " Sm" = small, the minimum required for U.S. Choice; " Tr" = traces, the requirement for U.S. Standard (USDA, 1989).


 
 


 

Table 2. Least squares means of spring and fall-born steers fed in the OK Steer Feedout from 1990 to 1997.

Item

Spring

Fall

P =

Steers

1562

646

 

 

In wt, lb

629

683

.0001

Sale wt, lba

1102

1178

.0001

 

Final age, d

413

468

.0001

Days fed 

167

162

.0001

 

ADG, lb

3.29

3.53

.0001

 

Carcass wt, lb

702

748

.0001

Dressing %

63.6

63.4

.115

 

Fat thickness, in

.34

.38

.0001

Ribeye area, in2

12.4

12.9

.0001

KPH fat, %

2.3

2.4

.0006

Yield grade

2.5

2.6

.0001

%YG1

20.4

18.9

 

%YG2

59.7

57.6

 

%YG3

19.5

22.3

 

%YG4

1.2

2.6

 

 

Marbling scoreb

Sl99

Sm15

.0001

% Prime

.8

1.6

 

% Prem Choice

12.2

7.7

 

% Low Choice

43.0

56.0

 

% Select

43.3

34.2

 

% Standard

.8

.5

 

 

Live $/cwt

69.81

70.25

.039

Carcass $/cwt

109.10

110.22

.0004

Boxed beef, % cwt

69.53

68.88

.0001

 

Net profit, $/hd

12.36

37.20

.0001

 

Profit/day of age

.030

.081

.0001

Profit/day on feed

.076

.225

.0001

a Sale weight = gross weight * .96.
b Marbling score: " Sm" = small, the minimum required for U.S.
Choice; " Sl" =slight degree, the minimum required for U.S. Select.


 

Table 3. Characteristics of steers fed in the OK Steer Feedout from 1990 to 1997 stratified by sire breed type.

 

 

Brahman
Influence

 

 

Continental
Milk

Item

Angus

British

Continental

Steers

694

385

216

191

722

 

In weight, lb

664b

647c

620d

687a

65cb

Sale weight, lbf

1148b

1115c

1115c

1169a

1154ab

 

Final age, d

442bc

438c

429d

449a

443b

Days fed 

160d

165c

156e

171a

169b

 

ADG, lb

3.54a

3.26c

3.50a

3.35bc

3.40b

 

Carcass wt, lb

729b

709c

704c

750a

733b

Dressing %

63.4bc

63.6b

63.1c

64.1a

63.5b

 

Fat thickness, in

.40a

.37b

.37ab

.33c

.30c

Ribeye area, in2

12.6c

12.2d

11.8e

13.6a

13.0b

KPH fat, %

2.3b

2.4a

2.1d

2.4ab

2.3c

Yield grade

2.7a

2.7a

2.7a

2.3b

2.3b

%YG1

10.2

15.8

7.4

34.0

31.4

%YG2

63.4

51.2

66.2

57.1

57.6

%YG3

25.5

29.1

26.4

9.9

11.5

%YG4

1.4

4.7

1.9

.5

.3

 

Marbling scoreg

Sm32a

Sm08 b

Sl91 c

Sm00 bc

Sm05 b

% Prime

2.3

1.3

.0

.0

.1

% Prem Choice

20.6

8.3

4.6

5.2

6.2

% Low Choice

52.3

44.2

53.7

38.7

43.1

% Select

24.4

45.2

41.2

55.5

49.7

% Standard

.4

1.0

.5

.5

.8

 

Live $/cwt

70.48b

69.41c

68.18d

71.47a

70.63b

Carcass $/cwt

110.62a

108.18b

107.32b

111.14a

111.04a

Boxed beef, %

68.65b

68.76b

68.71b

70.06a

69.84a

  

Net profit, $/hd

34.16ab

10.30c

6.03c

43.98a

29.44b

 

Profit/day of age

.21ab

.06c

.04c

.26a

.17b

Profit/day on feed

.077ab

.023c

.015c

.099a

.064b

a,b,c,d,eMeans in the same row with a common superscript letter do not differ(P.05).
f Sale weight = gross weight * .96.
gMarbling score: " Sm" = small, the minimum required for U.S. Choice; " Sl" = slight degree, the minimum required for U.S. Select.

 

1998 Research Report - Table of Contents